The d- and f-block chapter is crucial for both CBSE and competitive exams because it links electronic configurations to real chemical behavior—such as oxidation states, magnetic properties, stability of coordination compounds, ligand-field splitting, and special stability of lanthanoids/actinoids. Most board and JEE/NEET questions test whether you can correctly predict (i) spin states (high/low spin), (ii) CFSE and pairing effects, (iii) magnetic moments using spin-only formula, and (iv) why certain ions (like Eu²⁺ and Yb²⁺) show unusual stability.
20
Minutes
15
Questions
1 / -0
Marking
Q1. Consider the octahedral complex . Assuming CN is a strong-field ligand, how many unpaired electrons does the complex contain?
2
0 (diamagnetic)
4
1
Q2. Determine the oxidation state of cobalt and the number of unpaired electrons in the octahedral complex , given that is a weak-field ligand.
Co is , , 4 unpaired electrons
Co is , , 3 unpaired electrons
Co is , , 0 unpaired electrons
Co is , , 2 unpaired electrons
Q3. Which of the following best explains why is generally more stable than in aqueous solution? ( = ethylenediamine)
— is bidentate (forms chelate rings) whereas is monodentate
Both complexes have similar stability because both provide four nitrogen donors
— is a stronger -donor than
— chelate effect (formation of stable five-membered rings and favourable entropy) increases stability
Q4. Europium and ytterbium are more frequently encountered in the +2 oxidation state than most other lanthanoids. Which of the following provides the best explanation?
Their +2 state is favoured because Eu and Yb have relatively large ionic radii compared to others in the series
The +2 state is stabilised mainly by lattice energy effects because Eu and Yb are unusually small
Eu has a (half-filled) and Yb has a (filled) configuration; these electronic configurations offer additional stability, making reduction from +3 to +2 easier
The +2 oxidation state is stabilised due to strong participation of 5d orbitals in bonding for Eu and Yb
Q5. For () in octahedral coordination, predict the magnetic behaviour at room temperature for and respectively, given that CN is a strong-field ligand and F a weak-field ligand.
— diamagnetic (low-spin, 0 unpaired); — paramagnetic (high-spin, 4 unpaired)
Both complexes are diamagnetic.
Both complexes are paramagnetic with 4 unpaired electrons.
— paramagnetic; — diamagnetic
Q6. Using the spin-only formula , where is the number of unpaired electrons, calculate the magnetic moment (in ) of a high-spin octahedral ion.
Q7. Which of the following octahedral complexes has the largest ligand field stabilization energy (CFSE)? (Assume low-spin where applicable and neglect pairing energy; express CFSE in terms of .)
(Fe, , low-spin)
(Cr, )
(Mn, , high-spin)
(Co, , high-spin)
Q8. Gd exhibits an effective magnetic moment close to the spin-only value () while Sm shows an anomalously small observed moment. Which statement best explains this difference?
Gd has its orbital angular momentum quenched by the crystal field, whereas Sm retains full orbital contribution.
Gd forms more covalent bonds increasing its observed moment, while Sm is purely ionic.
Sm has all electrons paired in its ground state, giving a very low moment.
Gd has a half‑filled configuration with , so the moment is essentially spin-only; Sm () has significant spin–orbit coupling with partial cancellation between spin and orbital contributions, producing a small observed .
Q9. Which of the following gaseous/solvated metal ions is expected to form the most stable complex with CO (i.e., strongest M→CO π-backbonding) under comparable conditions?
()
()
()
()
Q10. For () in octahedral coordination, predict the magnetic behaviour at room temperature for and respectively, given that CN is a strong-field ligand and F a weak-field ligand.
— diamagnetic (low-spin, 0 unpaired); — paramagnetic (high-spin, 4 unpaired)
Both complexes are diamagnetic.
Both complexes are paramagnetic with 4 unpaired electrons.
— paramagnetic; — diamagnetic
Q11. For Mn^{2+} in an aqueous high-spin complex the electronic configuration is . Using the spin-only formula (where is the number of unpaired electrons), determine the number of unpaired electrons and the spin-only magnetic moment (in Bohr magneton).
4 unpaired electrons;
5 unpaired electrons;
3 unpaired electrons;
1 unpaired electron;
Q12. Consider octahedral complexes and of (). For , ; for , . The pairing energy for is . Using the criterion for low-spin and the spin-only formula , identify the spin state (low- or high-spin) and the spin-only magnetic moment (in BM) for each complex.
: high-spin, ; : low-spin,
Both and are low-spin; both
Both and are high-spin; both
: low-spin, ; : high-spin,
Q13. An octahedral complex () shows an absorption band at assigned to the transition (i.e. ). (a) Calculate in using . (b) Calculate the CFSE for (CFSE ). (c) State the expected spin-only magnetic moment (in BM). (Use .)
Q14. For the half-reaction the standard reduction potential is . In a solution where and , the complex formation constant is . Using and the Nernst equation at 298 K, calculate the reduction potential (in V) of the couple under these conditions.
Q15. A ion in an octahedral complex undergoes a tetragonal elongation (Jahn–Teller distortion) along the -axis. Which of the following correctly gives the qualitative energy ordering of the five -orbitals after elongation (highest → lowest) and identifies the orbital that contains the single unpaired electron in the configuration? (Assume axial ligands move farther away.)
; unpaired electron in
; unpaired electron in
; unpaired electron in
; unpaired electron in